Please contact your Representative and urge them
to sign on to the Jim Gibbons
The number of representatives who sign this
letter depends heavily on the efforts of constituents to express their support
for this effort. With the federal budget once again austere and competitive, it
is of utmost importance to garner signatures for the letter this year.
Representatives or Senators send
letters of support or request to Congressional leaders, asking them to take a specific course of
action in support of an issue. Often the author(s) of the letter
sends a "Dear Colleague letter / e-mail asking other members of Congress to "sign on" to a proposed letter
before it is sent to the rest of Congress. The number of signatories indicates
the level of importance of and support for a particular issue. Constituents must take the time
to alert their representatives to these letters and indicate their support for
the effort.
Your Representative's e-mail addresses and
fax numbers are available on their website at www.house.gov Ð it is most effective to contact key staff
- Be sure that the subject line in your e-mail
is clear: Please sign the Gibbons "MERIT" Dear Colleague, or request
Rep. [name] support funding for the MERIT program.
Cory Kennedy (
Legislative Director
Congressman Jim Gibbons (NV-02)
(202) 225-6155
- Be sure that you include your contact
information at the top of the e-mail/letter; this must include your name,
mailing address, phone number and e-mail address. NOTE: many offices will
discard correspondence that does not include contact information, or that comes
from outside of their district.
- In the opening paragraph of your message,
clearly state that you are writing to ask that your Representative sign the
Gibbons MERIT Dear Colleague letter. Tell them that the letter requests that
Congress provide the USGS with $5 million in FY 2006 funding for this new, but
long-recommended program.
-Briefly
explain why focused funding for applied research related to mineral resources
is important to you and/or your institution (e.g., only source of funding for
your area of research, helps support undergraduate/graduate student research
experience, leads to innovation, relates to jobs and/or other challenges in
your community or region etc).
(these
suggestion modified from AGU site for support of NSF funding:
http://www.agiweb.org/gap/legis109/nsfdearcolletter_alert.html)
The following is the Dear Colleague letter requesting support (what we need to have our Representatives support):
April
20, 2005
Mineral resource education and research
in the United States is collapsing!
Support Mineral Education and Research
Initiative (MERIT)

Dear
Colleague,
Mineral
resource education and research in the United States is declining. This
is happening in spite of the increasingly fundamental role mineral resources
play in our economy. University positions in Economic Geology and Mining
Engineering have steadily disappeared with requirements or transfer into other
fields. As a result, expertise on mineral issues is limited throughout the
entire industry. As the chart above illustrates, this trend will only
continue unless Congress acts soon.
Please
join me in sending a letter to the Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior
Chairman Taylor and Ranking Member Dicks to ask for the creation of an external
grants program in mineral resources and material flows called Mineral Education
and Research Initiative (MERIT). MERIT would be a peer-reviewed external grants
program through the USGS that would support applied research and education
broadly related to mineral deposits. Such a program is critical for the
survival and health of mineral resources activities in US institutions.
If
you would like to sign onto the letter, or have questions, please contact Cory
Kennedy at 5-6155 or cory.kennedy@mail.house.gov. The deadline for
signatures is COB on April 22, 2005.
Sincerely,
Congressman
Jim Gibbons (NV-02)
*Chart provided by Mark Barton, Director of the
Center for Mineral Resources and Professor at University of Arizona, and John
Dilles, Professor at Oregon State University.
The following is the letter that would be sent to appropriations by Representative Gibbons and others:
Honorable
Charles Taylor The
Honorable Norman D. Dicks
Chairman Ranking
Member
Appropriations
Subcommittee On Interior Appropriations
Subcommittee On Interior
United States House of Representatives United
States House of Representatives
Washington,
D.C. 20515 Washington,
D.C. 20515
Dear Chairman Taylor:
We are writing to ask for your support for the
creation of an external grants program in mineral resources and material flows
called the Mineral Education and Research Initiative (MERIT) in the FY 2006
Interior Appropriations bill. This program will be in the US Geological Survey
(USGS) and is within their existing authority to offer external grants.
Each year nearly 25 tons of non-fuel mineral
materials are mined for each person in the United States. According to the USGS in 2004, these commodities -
ranging from metals to fertilizers to construction materials - directly
contribute roughly $418 billion to our Gross Domestic Product (GDP). These
resources are fundamental to sustaining a competitive and modern economy. The
U.S. is the global leader in mineral consumption and must be able to produce or
acquire minerals in a sustainable and responsible manner.
The USGS provides scientific information and
research on minerals but is increasingly unable to address national needs due
to budgetary constraints and a reduction in workforce during the last 15 years.
The numbers of faculty, degrees granted, and research grants funded in mineral
resource programs in U.S. universities have also declined, and unfortunately,
this decline is anticipated to continue. Consequently, we believe there is a
need for increased federal investment in sustained scientific expertise to
expand this critical part of our economy.
MERIT would be a peer-reviewed external grants
program through the USGS that would support applied research and education
broadly related to mineral deposits. Such a program is critical for the
survival and health of mineral resources activities in U.S. institutions.
This new program was recommended by the National
Academies' National Research Council (NRC). The NRC has published three reports
that highlight the need for federal funding of mineral-resource and related
research. In 2004, the NRC recommended funding a program in Material Flows, the
tracking of supplies, use, and paths of minerals within the global economy,
which has tremendous implications for national security. A small investment
into this important program will strengthen our nation's research capabilities
by building external scientific expertise, and it will maintain strong
educational and training programs so that we remain the world leaders in these
fields.
Given the current constraints on funding of
federal programs, and without a Budget Resolution, we understand the challenges
you face during the FY 2006 appropriations process. However, we feel that
funding for this important program is crucial for the strategic development of
domestic sources of minerals. Thank you for your careful consideration of our
request and for your continued leadership.
Sincerely,
Cory Kennedy
Legislative Director
Congressman Jim Gibbons (NV-02)
(202) 225-6155