The University of Arizona
Department of GeosciencesspaceAboutPeopleAcademicsResearchProgramsEventsNewsPhotos
College of Sciencespacered bar

People | George Davis


Provost's Comments at A Symposium on Creativity

Sponsored by
The Arizona Senior Academy and The Academy Village
Tucson, Arizona
January 11, 2002


This conference is about the mind and the imagination, and the convergence of the two in creativity. Can creativity, whatever its source in individual human beings, be stimulated to greater collective height and impact within individual human organizations, universities in particular? If so, what are the conditions that favor this objective?

First, universities must recruit and retain faculty who are absolutely passionate about, and care deeply about, their intellectual pursuits. For creative breakthroughs stem in part from constantly turning over things in your mind.

Teenagers say (to their parents), "Don't obsess!" Creative individuals must obsess. Take Mozart as an extreme example. In a letter written by Mozart and included in Marcia Davenport's important biography, Mozart, Mozart describes how Don Giovanni took shape in one of the most perfect of "pleasing, lively dreams."

"Whence and how [my ideas] come, I know not; nor can I force them. These ideas that please me I retain in memory, and am accustomed, as I have been told, to hum them to myself. If I continue in this way, it soon occurs to me how I may turn this or that morsel to account, so as to make a good dish of it...All this fires my soul, and provided I am not disturbed, my subject enlarges itself, becomes methodized and defined, and in the whole, though it be long, stands almost complete and finished in my mind, so that I can survey it, like a fine picture, or a beautiful statue, at a glance...I hear in my imagination the parts...as it were, gleich alles zusammen, all at once...Still the actual hearing...is after all the best. What has thus been produced, I do not easily forget, and this is perhaps the best gift I have my Divine Maker to thank for."

Second, universities determined to achieve heightened expressions of creativity must shape an environment where people feel supported as they take risks.

Arthur Miller describes risks in his autobiography, Timebends. Without understanding why, he knew that Death of a Salesman had to be written in a single sitting, in a night or a day. All he had was the first two lines. The lines were "Willy!" and "It's all right. I came back." He dared not venture further. He knew he was about to begin a "risky expedition into [him]self." Instead of working up materials and writing more lines, he prepared a place to write, a little plywood shack.

"And all the while afraid I would never be able to penetrate past those two first lines...I started one morning...I wrote all day until dark, and then I had dinner and went back and wrote until some hour in the darkness between midnight and four...By new morning I had done the first half...the first act of two. [It did not have to be changed.] When I lay down to sleep I realized I had been weeping -- my eyes still burned and my throat was sore from talking it all out and shouting and laughing...I would be stiff when I woke, aching as if I had played four hours of football...and now had to face the start of another game."

Arthur Miller's testimony to the risks involved in a creative discovery brings us directly to one of Robert Grudin's major emphases in his book, The Grace of Great Things. Grudin contends that creative achievement requires heroic strengths that cannot be described without using moral language, like integrity, endurance, and courage. To quote Grudin,

"These virtues...become essential when one's challenges involve self-discovery, spirited inquiry, and individual expression. They are necessary because of the extreme difficulty of original thinking which must be developed over long periods of time, quite often without adequate societal support."

Grudin compares innovative thinking to a voyage, and its territory to a frontier.

Third, environments in which creativity is apt to flourish require the gift of time, time to reflect.

Administrators within institutions of higher learning have an obligation and responsibility to interpret to political and community leaders, to alumni to their own faculty and staff, and to students and their parents, the essential importance of preserving time in faculty life. For the scholarly reflections and accomplishments that issue from time is the stuff out of which the classroom, seminar, workshop, and studio becomes vibrant. It takes time and reflection to discover connections between things not obviously connected.

Again, Grudin's words,

"No matter where we live, we inhabit the continent of time, a continent less studied and charted than any other. Creative people move purposefully across this continent, truly explore it. The rest of us shack up in little patches and clearings of time, always harried, always distracted, slave to the next knock on the office door or phone all. Our professional lives show an alarmingly high percentage of 'response activities' -- meeting deadlines, obeying directives, dealing with emergencies -- as opposed to activities developing independent initiatives...The protected and usually large, physical spaces that creative individuals demand for their work -- studios, libraries, laboratories -- are matched by the protected expanses of time that they stake out, day after day, across their careers. These regularly repeated periods, often whole mornings or afternoons, are so massive that they become quasi-physical presences whose substance can be sculpted into regular achievement. I call these expanses of time 'chronocosms' (time worlds)...People unacquainted with such time worlds have little chance to experience creative insight."

Fourth, universities must oppose the tendency to slide to overly bureaucratic, overly administrative approaches that block faculty and students from doing their best work. Keep the big picture alive.

Peter Coney, a distinguished University of Arizona professor, now deceased, understood what was required of a university to nurture growth and discovery. He articulated it persuasively,

"I have always felt as I pass from the turmoil of urban streets through the gates and onto the campus of an institution of higher learning, anywhere in the world, a sense of relief and comfort, solemnity and freedom. The feeling is not unlike that when one enters a national park, for this is what colleges and universities are -- they are sanctuaries, preserves -- of civilization. They are the only institution in the course of human endeavor whose sole purpose and mission is to know the course, content, and directions of civilization, to understand, preserve protect, and transmit these findings, and to seek further advances and new insights into the truth of ourselves and the world...[The] environment should...assure exposure to all the necessary skills and the best ideas and conceptual frameworks of the time, and provide stimulation from an active, well-read thoughtful, positive, innovative, and open faculty, all in an atmosphere of freedom and tolerance. Like libraries that have to have all the books to make sure they have the one somebody needs, we have to have the freedom at universities to tolerate and encourage all sorts of individual diversity, both in faculty and students, so that we can be sure that the best mind gets the exposure to the best cognitive resource which might enable that one in a million new idea that can change the course of a discipline, or civilization."

Fifth, universities must promote and reward interdisciplinary activities. This is an arena where The University of Arizona excels. We could talk and talk about this.

An example of the ethos was communicated to me by Bill Dickinson, professor emeritus and member of the National Academy of Sciences. He describes in specific terms the path to creative discovery about who we are as a human race, especially in relation to our environment.

"Our very ability to forecast the environmental future with any accuracy depends upon the blending of insights from diverse intellectual wellsprings. 1) From humanism, History, which bases insights principally on the written record but without even the most rudimentary facts about Pleistocene climates and landscapes. 2) From social sciences, Archaeology, with a primary focus on strictly human prehistory prior to the advent of comprehensive written records. 3) From the physical sciences, Quaternary geology, but almost entirely divorced from considerations of human behavior. 4) From the life sciences, Ecology and Biogeography, but with minimal attention to prehistoric antecedents. Each of these disparate approaches led to only partial understanding of the full tapestry of the Holocene past, i.e. the last 10,000 years. Casting off discipline-oriented blinders has permitted us to achieve a more integrated vision of Holocene history by working from the premise that environmental and human history are parallel tracks along the same road map across an every-changing Holocene landscape."

Sixth, universities wishing to enhance their institutional creative potential should look for and measure and "own" the attributes that nourish creativity at the individual human level.

For Grudin, the attributes of the creative mind, and thus the creative institution, are inspiration, discovery analysis, imagination, and sense of beauty. The ethics of creativity for an individual and an institution require integrity, pain, courage, self-knowledge, and freedom.

And there must be a sense of expectation.

According to Grudin,

"Nothing stifles the spirit of discovery more effectively than the assumption that miracles have ceased. In other words, most people do not make discoveries because they do not expect to. Discovery has in it not only exacting precision but absurd aspiration; it weighs hairs and expects miracles."


Line

Why Geos? | About Us | People | Academics | Course Pages | Research | Programs | Events | News | Photos
Contact Us | University of Arizona | College of Science | Webmail | Forms | Time Card

Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Gould-Simpson Building #77, 1040 E 4th St., Tucson, AZ 85721
Telephone: (520) 621-6000, Fax: (520) 621-2672

All contents ©. All rights reserved.